About indices

The distribution of the results is very irregular, shifted towards lower values. Only 20% of municipalities reached values above 5.1. This indicates big difference in availability of practitioners in the few municipalities with the highest values and in the rest of the republic.

The distribution of the results is relatively regular with the concentration at the center, because the 20% of municipalities with the lowest availability of pediatricians reached values in a similar range (0 - 3.3) to the 20% of municipalities with the highest values (values between 6.0 - 10). The availability of pediatricians varies from one municipality to another, but in most municipalities the differences are not so significant.

The distribution of the results is very irregular. The resulting index of almost half of municipalities is higher than 9. This is due to the fact that in most of the municipalities at least one hospital is located directly in their territory. So the driving time to the nearest hospital is very similar. Lower values are achieved by municipalities that do not have a hospital and whose residents have to go to the hospital in one of the adjacent municipalities.

The distribution of the results is irregular, shifted towards lower values. Only 25% of municipalities reached values above 5.1. This indicates a big difference in the availability of pharmacies in the few municipalities with the highest results compared to the rest of the republic.

The distribution of the results is relatively regular with the concentration at the center. The achieved values of 60% of the municipalities are in a relatively narrow range of 3.8 - 6.7, which means that the average life expectancy does not differ much. Big differences in life expectance are found only in a few municipalities on both ends of the spectrum. The difference between municipalities with the lowest and the highest average life expectancy for men is about 7 years and for women is about 6 years.

The distribution of the results is slightly irregular, shifted towards higher values. The achieved values of 60% of the municipalities are in a relatively narrow range of 4.2 - 6.8, which means that air quality does not differ much in most municipalities. At the same time, it is clear from the distribution that the municipalities with lowest values have significantly higher levels of pollution than the rest of the republic. These municipalities have been on the limit of the 2012 Air Protection Act air pollution limit values for a long time.

The distribution of the results is slightly irregular, shifted towards lower values with the concentration at the center. The achieved values of 60% of municipalities are in a relatively narrow range of 2.6 - 5.9 and 20% of municipalities reached values above 6.0. Which means that in the several municipalities with the highest results, there is significantly less companies releasing pollutants than in the rest of the republic.

The distribution of the results is very irregular. The resulting index of more than half of municipalities is not higher than 2. This is due to the large difference in the availability of protected areas in the few municipalities with the highest results and the rest of the republic. These are municipalities with national parks and large protected landscape areas in their surroundings.

The distribution of the results is irregular, shifted towards higher values. This is due to the fact that in the most of the municipalities unemployment is at a similar low level, while in municipalities at the bottom of the ladder the unemployment rate is significantly higher than in the rest of the republic. In general, unemployment in all regions of the Czech Republic is relatively low, which makes the Czech Republic at the level of unemployment one of leading countries in the whole European Union.

The distribution of the results is very irregular, shifted towards lower values. Only 20% of the municipalities reached an index value above 4.0. This means that the citizens of municipalities with the highest results have a significantly higher offering of jobs on job portals than those of most other municipalities.

The distribution of the results is very irregular, shifted towards lower values. The resulting index of more than half of municipalities is not higher than 2.0 and only 20% of municipalities reached an index value higher than 4.2. This indicates that in the few of municipalities with the highest number of job offers, job offers at the Labor Office are significantly higher than in the rest of the republic.

The distribution of the results is very irregular, shifted towards lower values. Only 20% of municipalities reached values higher than 4.9, which means that in a few municipalities the average housing price is significantly lower than in most of the municipalities in the country. Generally speaking, housing prices in individual regions are quite distinct.

The distribution of the results is irregular, shifted towards higher values. A total of 80% of municipalities reached values above 5.3. The distribution shows that in most municipalities the situation is similar to that of the municipality with the highest value. On the contrary, several municipalities at the bottom of the ladder are rated significantly lower compared to the rest of the republic.

The distribution of the results is irregular, shifted towards higher values. A total of 80% of municipalities reached values above 4.6. The distribution shows that in the majority of municipalities, there is a similar share of the population in financial distress, which is slightly higher than in some of the few municipalities with the highest values. In contrast, in several municipalities at the bottom of the ladder, the share of people with financial distress is significantly higher than in the rest of the republic.

The distribution of the results is relatively regular with the concentration at the center. Achieved values of 60% of municipalities are in a relatively narrow range of 3.5 - 6.3, which means that the availability of kindergartens does not differ much among most administrative districts. Significantly higher or lower values occur only in several administrative districts of municipalities at both ends of the ranking. 

The distribution of the results is slightly irregular, shifted towards higher values. A total of 80% of municipalities reached values higher than 4.0. Achieved values of 60% of the municipalities are in a relatively narrow range of 4.0 - 6.7, which means that the availability of elementary school does not differ much among most administrative districts. Significantly higher or lower values occur only in several administrative districts of municipalities at both ends of ranking.

The distribution of the results is very irregular, shifted towards lower values. This means that in the few municipalities with the highest results there is a significantly higher availability of high-quality high schools than in most other municipalities. There are even a few municipalities where there are no schools with above-average student results on national final exams, neither in the municipality nor in the surrounding area.

The distribution of the results is slightly irregular, shifted slightly to lower values. The achieved values of 60% of municipalities are in a relatively narrow range of 3.0 - 5.3, which means that in most municipalities the availability of supermarkets does not differ significantly. A few municipalities at both ends of the ranking have significantly less or more of the largest retail chain stores.

The distribution of the results is slightly irregular, shifted slightly towards lower values. the achieved values of 60% of the municipalities are in relatively narrow range of 3.3 - 5,4, which means that in most municipalities the availability of ATMs does not differ significantly. A few municipalities at both ends of the ranking have significantly less or more of the ATMs.

The distribution of the results is irregular, shifted towards lower values. Only 20% of municipalities reached an index value higher than 4.3, and 60% of municipalities are in a relatively narrow range of 2.2 - 4.3. This signifies a similar level of restaurant availability in most of the municipalities and a large difference in the few municipalities with the highest results.

The distribution of the results is very irregular, with 80% of municipalities not achieving index values higher than 3.3. This means that municipalities with the highest values have significantly higher access to movie projections in cinemas than other municipalities. These are mainly municipalities that have at least one multiplex nearby.

The distribution of the results is relatively regular with the concentration at the center because the 20% of municipalities at the bottom of the ladder reached values in a similar range (0 - 3.2) as the 20% of municipalities with the highest values (values in the range of 6.7 - 10). The level of the road network varies from one municipality to the next, but for most municipalities the differences are not very large.

The distribution of the results is very irregular, 80% of the municipalities have not reached an index value higher than 2.9. This means that the municipalities with the highest results have a significantly higher availability of train transport than other municipalities. These are mainly the municipalities that are passed through by the main railway corridors with a high number of international and national connections.

The distribution of the results is slightly irregular, shifted slightly to lower values. The achieved values of 60% of the municipalities are in relatively narrow range of 2.7 - 5.7, which means that in most municipalities the number of clubs and associations does not differ significantly. A few municipalities at both ends of the ranking have significantly less or more of the numbers of clubs and associations.

The distribution of the results is relatively regular with the concentration at the center. The 20% of municipalities at the low end of the ranking reached values in a similar range (0 - 3.1) to the 20% of municipalities with the highest results (values in the range of 6.2 - 10). In most municipalities, electoral participation is at a similar level. However, the difference between municipalities with the highest result and the lowest result is 26%.

The distribution of the results is irregular, shifted towards higher values. This indicates that in most municipalities the number of traffic accidents was similar when related to population, but the number of traffic accidents in the municipalities at the low end of the ladder was significantly higher.

The distribution of the results is very irregular, shifted towards higher values. More than 20% of the municipalities have achieved the same highest result 10. This is due to the fact that in several municipalities gambling is outlawed. On the contrary, 20% of the municipalities with the lowest values range from 0 - 6.6, which means there are large differences in access to gambling in these few municipalities compared to most municipalities in the Czech Republic.

The distribution of the results is irregular, shifted slightly to lower values. Only 20% of the municipalities reached an index value higher than 5.0 and 60% of the municipalities are in a relatively narrow range of 1.9 - 5.0. In the municipalities with an index value higher than 3.5, there is an increase in the population of young people. On the contrary, in the municipalities with a value lower than 3.5, there is a decrease in the population of young people. 

The distribution of the results is slightly irregular with the 20% municipalities with the lowest results reaching values ranging from 0 - 2.6 and the 20% of the municipalities with the highest results ranging between 5.9 - 10. In the municipalities with an index value higher than 5.4, there is an increase in the population. On the contrary, in the municipalities with a value lower than 5.4, there is a decrease in the population.